Great Image quality (warmer than M-10, looks more like M-9 CCD image rendering). Intro Sample Images Lenses Specs Performance. I love the M240, didn't feel to switch to the M10. RE: the ISO issue. I have used many rangefinders, a Leica M8, M9 (and its variants M-E/M9P/MM), M262, M240P and of course most recently the M-D 262. The color profile is quite different too, with more electric blues and purer reds. Without a magnifier piece.comfortable view is 50-35mm. They were taken about a minute apart as I only had one tripod and needed to put the . By The renderings are quite good as a whole, and this feature is not contained in the M10 which relegates one to only the lens filter option.Card Writing Speed. Mostly because I wanted to shoot below 0.7m and Id have to use Live View for that. If you arent aware of these lenses, they focus down to about 40cm. Having said that, I think the M262 could be a perfect digital rangefinder camera for those looking for a minimal film-camera like digital Leica experience and not needing live view or other features. These were features I wanted to explore whilst I had this camera though I really had very low expectations that they would do much for me. Now, if the shutter was fully mechanical and cocked by hand that would be a very different thing. 35mmc is a blog authored, edited and published by Hamish Gill featuring daily articles submitted by readers. That said, even in the short time Ive owned a Leica M240, its confused me with what seems like an obvious short coming, changed my mind about one feature that I had written of as pretty much useless to me, proved that another one of its highlight features is indeed something I have no interest in, and perhaps unfortunately (since I cant afford one) left me with big a chunk of Leica M10 GAS. Image quality is exceptionally good across the native ISO range, the weight has been decreased substantially, and . The sensor is not the same, by the way. has a removable battery. I was even contemplating selling my Leica lenses and the M3 as well, but I love using that film M system (and film photography) so much that I could not do it (at least not yet)! Of course, Id skipped the M240 and gone from M9 to M262 though surprisingly, the menu system of the M262 is even more stripped back than that of the M9. I decided that I wanted to keep the one camera that can do close to everything I need in the digital world (and for me, this includes personal and occasional professional work, mostly product still photography, but also videography). Functionalism be damned. Oddly though, handling the Leica M262 there is the slightest sense that somethings missing when comparing it to its fuller-featured sibling, the M240. Im not loaded, but I do focus almost all my disposable income on this. Whilst I fully get that it is down to personal preference, I just thought I would ask the question: M240 (or its E and P variants) or M262? Leica M-E Typ 240 vs Leica M typ 262 - YouTube To begin with, I tried put the idea to the back of my mind, then one day I opened the cupboard a saw my Monochrom sat there looking underused. Leica M-D (Typ 262) Review | PCMag Monochromatic Rendering - Comparing the Leica M10, Leica M240, Leica M-E "CCD" M9 M9-P CCD. Either way, its the M262 that I want to keepif(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[250,250],'35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-1','ezslot_18',188,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-1-0'); Though I must admit, this experience has had me thinking that an M10 would be better suited to me now. Leica has issued new, updated firmware for the entire range of Leica M10 and M240-generation cameras. I find it to be a useful feature at times. To each his own. LEICA M10 CAMERA VS. LEICA M240 - IMAGE QUALITY - YouTube This page contains all hands-on, detailed Camera Reviews that have been published at Photography Life. The latter requires the lens to have 6-bit coding or manual setting of the lens in the main menu. I just dont shoot it at that high ISO for it to be a problem, and often wonder what on earth people are doing with their cameras to need the sorts of high ISOs that get spoken about it reviews. To seethedifference between Leica M Typ 262 vs M Typ 240 cameras we have put together Leica M Typ 262 vs M Typ 240 specs comparison tablebelow. A device's overall image quality score considers: color depth, dynamic range and low light performance. This might sound like a small criticism, and Im sure many wouldnt even notice or care, but actually it goes back to what I was saying earlier about familiarity. It does take lovely photos however and I dont mind using I most of the time but. As cboy pointed out above, that may limit lens choice. Lastly, its kind of neat that these two are sort of a match- but different enough to stand out on my desk when I go to grab one for a shoot. Adjusting colours always feels like a headache, but is one Ive broadly avoided with this camera. Ultimately, if youre looking for all the bells and whistles, you certainly wont find them on this camera. The even newer M-P Typ 240 purchase just opens up addtional opportunities of using a digital M as a multi-purpose tool. Even when recording scenes with a lot of fast movements, the videos are sharp and clear. Menu. Can you compare side by side, please? The focus motor moves the lens in order to autofocus. I have purchased an M262 and, given my budget, a Voigtlander Ultron 35mm (which I have read is actually a really good lens). This is exiting news in so many ways that I will now test your patience for a few minutes in trying to explain it. It is capable of shooting stills in a lossless compressed raw format. A Long Term Leica M262 Review - PhotolisticLife Got a spare lottery ticket? Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. It was that feeling that having less kit would do me good This became the excuse I needed to change up to the M10. In case youre confused, the M240 was the camera that followed the Leica M9. What's the best camera for shooting sports and action? Last year I got the 262 and had been quite pleased with it. Quite possibly because my camera at the time didnt have it as a feature, I denied that I would ever find it useful. In fact, I could almost go as far to say that even this stripped back Leica has too many buttons and options for my needs! I wish I did. I dont need such features on my Leica rangefinders these are real cameras that I use properly, I dont need live-view with my real cameras! Limited to 75 - 35/28mm. Id prefer to do this with the Leica as its the camera I use most often and so the battery is always charged with space on a memory card. Leica M9 vs. M240; M240: More Thoughts; Leica M240: Final Verdict; Leica M9 sharpness vs. Sony RX1R, Nikon D800E, Fuji X100s; My camera of the year for 2013; Related. I did, yes I have an M10-P now. I could sell the M262, and my beloved Monochrom (and maybe a couple of lenses), thus satisfying the GAS problem and simultaneously slimming down my cameras without actually having to spend any more money or as my mate James would say, I could make this a revenue-neutral purchase. And I like the grainy renderings for some scenes.Live View. Otherwise, the two cameras are similar since the 262 is really just a pared-down version of the 240 and if its mainly the rangefinder experience that you are after then you cant go wrong with either. The color profile is quite different too, with more electric blues and purer reds. But nope, they included a hardly useful flourish, that as you say, looks like it was thought up but a marketing department. Paste as plain text instead, At which point I bought a stand-in M240 and I discovered the joys of live view on an m-mount Leica. I got the m262 because it has everything i need and nothing i do not need. This really piqued my interest. With AF tracking, once you choose the subject and press the shutter release part way down, as the subject moves, the autofocus will follow it. There are two things to be separated here. As I understand technically m240 is similar to m262 (only some features, but not sensor). If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. We were shooting inside a large carpet manufacturers in Kidderminster and I was trying to get some slightly abstract well timed shots of the various goings on in the factory. If you want video and live view, get the 240. The price is$5195/4050. document.getElementById("ak_js_1").setAttribute("value",(new Date()).getTime()); This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Leica M Typ 262 Digital Rangefinder Camera - Black (Body Only) - eBay I think the sensor is the same, only the signal processing is different because there is no LV. So as I said in the first few paragraphs, now its on its way out, I thought I should do it the justice of writing a few parting words about it. Then along comes the M262, digital Leica I'd been waiting for. It tells you : take your time, have fun with the manual focus, enjoy the concepts small is beautiful and less is more, listen to the music made by the shutter, look how discret you are when shooting and readily agreed, leave the arm race to the geek and feel free to take pictures your way.Shooting with the M262 is as simple and as pleasant as a walk in the forest in summer. The fact that Ive somehow managed to rationalise my way out of that opinion doesnt change how good the M262 really is, and indeed how well suited to me I once felt it to be. The Leica M-D (Typ 262) ($5,995) is the camera for photographers who wish that digital didn't happen. The device is protected with extra seals to prevent failures caused by dust, raindrops, and water splashes. No one ever uses video functionality of the240 anyways. The image quality of the Leica M240 is outstanding. Opinions, recommendations: M10 v. M240 v. M246 v. M262 v. Monochrom 246 document.getElementById("ak_js_1").setAttribute("value",(new Date()).getTime()); This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. For the M240, forget it. I think it is a very cool and stripped down digital M camera that I purchased used to compliment my M3 (I use the M3 with a 50mm and 90mm lens). I then had a feeling that Im sure a lot of people who have too many cameras have once in a while You might know it yourself? (Leica M Typ 240), Nikon D850 + Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-120mm f/4G ED VR, Canon EOS 5D Mark IV + Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM, Sony Alpha a7 III + Sony FE 24-105mm f/4 G OSS, Sony a6600 + Sony E 18-135mm F3__5-5__6 OSS, Sony Alpha a7 III + Sony FE 28-70mm f/3__5-5__6 OSS, Canon EOS 5D Mark IV + Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM. The camera becomes entirely unresponsive. "MM-P""" Leica M Typ240MM-P Typ240 I just bought a M262.Its my 3rd Leica M (after a M6 and a M240) and each time I come back to a M, its a delight. That alone justifies the decision to buy. I so rarely hit the menu button on this camera, it practically doesnt need to be there for my purposes, and Id imagine most users find the same. Something about the idea that it had all these weird and wonderful features made me expect a camera that felt different. In the real world, I was making the M9 work for me in terms of low light shooting, as such, I have literally never found a single issue with high ISO noise from the M262. I've always wanted a Leica and was thinking of picking up a used M262 or M240 to replace my Fuji. An electronic viewfinder (EVF) with a higher resolution provides a sharper image, producing a view comparable in quality with the one displayed on an optical viewfinder. Finally, a digital camera that truly feels like a good old analog Leica. With ACR, my standard daylight setting for the M240 is 5300/10, while with the M262, it is 5000/0, both with embedded profile. In fact, I caught myself using it a number of times without thinking. Thanks for posting, enjoyed the images. No more out of focus shots.