If COVID-19 mRNA is safe where are the libel lawsuits by Pharma? [2]. But to insist, as one on-screen interviewee does, that the material world around us is just one "possible movement of consciousness" undermines the possibility of any objective, external reality--something fundamental to many religions and to science. Then we segue to a narrative starring Amanda (Marlee Maitlin), a wedding photographer who's bummed because her slimy husband cheated on her. It is just a movie. Not everything is possible. I was really impressed and although it sounded totally crazy, the Einsteinian language that their brochures were using had nearly convinced me that they really know something about fundamental physics. This will be revisited if any. That would be, very hard to quantify:). One has already been recognized: If we do carefully prepare quantum systems, and keep them isolated, we can perform quantum magic technologically potentially on scales that we haven't been able to do before. Its true that Hagelin stopped doing physics in the mid-nineties to concentrate on his other nonsense, but I can vouch for the fact that as early as 1978-9 he was heavily involved in TM and thought it had a lot to do with QFT. Right after the Velvet Revolution in 1989 (the collapse of the Czechoslovak communism), many new spiritual and other directions were trying to find their ways to the new free countries. "The theory can't predict with precision what will happen, but it knows everything that can happen and it will tell you the probability of all these things happening.". The quantum mechanical correlations, the spooky action at a distance that quantum mechanics brings up, is true only for very specially prepared systems that are isolated from the rest of the world, completely. What the Bleep Do We Know!? - Rotten Tomatoes And quantum mechanics is often used as the explanation for that. Isnt Langs viewpoint in line with the sort of criticism that string theory receives at this web site? It went on to say that "Most laypeople cannot tell where the quantum physics ends and the quantum nonsense begins, and many are susceptible to being misguided," and that "a physics student may be unable to convincingly confront unjustified extrapolations of quantum mechanics," a shortcoming which the authors attribute to the current teaching of quantum mechanics, in which "we tacitly deny the mysteries physics has encountered". Is the movie What The Bleep Do We Know? factual or mumbo jumbo - Quora Some movies are so bad, they're funny. And while I dont think supersymmetric GUTs are anywhere near as promising as many people seem to think, they are a much saner idea than many that dominate research these days (take the Landscape, please). improve functionality and performance. In addition to the films three directors, there were actors and others involved in the production who are long time "students" of Ramthas' School of enlightenment. Everything from the possibility of disappearing and reappearing, to the possibility of having strange new forms of communication. Your session to The Christian To accomplish that, you would have to invoke "new physics," Dr. Schumm says, in which the explanation can be verified or falsified through experiment. Never mind that the movie didnt even have a plot. But Hagelin's use of the term "achieved" for the drop in crime is a bit strong. The weirdness of quantum mechanics is reserved for either very specially prepared configurations in the laboratory, or scales that are so small that quantum-mechanical effects are significant. There was some sort of plot involving a woman photographer (played by Marlee Matlin), who wanders around and has anxiety attacks. One of the scientists who was in the film and had never appeared at the school is Dr David Albert Professor and Director of Philosophical Physics at Columbia university. Particles Popping Into & Out of Existence. Intercut with these metaphysical ponderings is a soapy fictional narrative starring Marlee Matlin as a broken-hearted photographer. What the #$*! Do We (K)now!? - Letterboxd That's not always true, but it's often true. D (k)ow!? The movie features other proclaimed scientists who . (eBook/PDF) Curious Obsessions In The History Of Science And What the Bleep Do We Know? | Not Even Wrong - Columbia University "We only see what we believe is possible Native American Indians on Caribbean Islands couldn't see Columbus's ships [sitting on the horizon] because they were beyond their knowledge" Dr. Candace Pert (former scientist, current new-age guru) in What the Bleep Do We Know? [5] Foreign gross added another $5 million for a worldwide gross of nearly $16 million. But are there new, weird applications that people might see that have an impact on everyday life, beyond the woo-woo? He points out that Gallo et al anounced that AIDS is caused by HIV at a press conference, without there being a single paper published in a scientific journal substantiating this. The experts start "proving" that humans create their own reality by getting too attached to certain brain chemicals. The minds boggle | Science | The Guardian "Your mind can't tell the difference between what it sees and what it remembers" Dr Joseph Dispenza (Chiropractor ) in What the Bleep Do We Know? As the sample size grows, so does the scientist's confidence in the statistical inferences drawn from the large sample. Is that last line The fact that someone who spouts such utter nonsense can get a Ph.D. from Harvard and be one of the most widely cited authors on supersymmetric models is pretty remarkable some sort of strange attack on SUSY models? According to Joo Magueijo, professor in theoretical physics at Imperial College, the film deliberately misquotes science. Both are indeed mysterious, and their genuine mystery needs none of the hype with which this film relentlessly and noisily belabours us", concluding that the film is "tosh". ft. house now used as offices), the Great Hall (a converted 15,375 sq. But it's quite a leap to say the brain doesn't know the difference between vision and memory. John Hagelin, PhD, describes a study he did in Washington in 1992. Science and engineering are important for our future, and anything that engages the public can only be a good thing." That's not the case. Somehow the main character of the movie was learning these amazing facts about quantum physics, and this then helps her deal with her anxiety attacks, bad body image and sex addiction (the film really goes off the rails in a bizarre scene where she is the photographer at a wedding party that turns into a grotesque kind of orgy). "Physical reality is absolutely rock solid, yet it only comes into existence when it bumps up against another piece of physical reality like us, or a rock." Some argue that the same quantum processes seen in the universe around us have an effect on consciousness as well, but physicist Lawrence Krauss says that's highly debatable. Particles are fluctuations the rules of physics say it's perfectly fine for them to exist at some time and/or place and to be non-existent at another time and/or place. What the Bleep Do We Know?: Discovering the Endless - Amazon Also, the movie suggests that the quantum idea of matter embracing all its possible states at once applies to the larger world of people and rocks. Initially, the film was released in only two theaters: one in Yelm, Washington (the home of the producers, which is also the home of Ramtha), and the other the Bagdad Theater in Portland, Oregon, where it was filmed. Perhaps that is why they couldnt see them. Dr Joao Migueijo is reader in theoretical physics at Imperial College, London.What the Bleep Do We Know!? Our mind has enormous potential, but we only use a small part of it for conscious thought, and we miss a lot of what's going on around us so, in a leap of creatively edited logic 3. The film was also discussed in a letter published in Physics Today that challenges how physics is taught, saying teaching fails to "expose the mysteries physics has encountered [and] reveal the limits of our understanding". Dr Joe Dispenza and Miceal Ledwith are both long time students and appointed teachers at Ramthas school of enlightenment (RSE). It is true that quantum mechanics is extremely strange, and on extremely small scales for short times, all sorts of weird things happen. Beyond fear, beyond anger. WHAT THE BLEEP DO WE KNOW?! - American Chemical Society He is also the theologian in residence of RSE. William Arntz has referred to the film as "WTFDWK" in a message to the film's street team. In the letter, the authors write: "the movie illustrates the uncertainty principle with a bouncing basketball being in several places at once. The brain processes 400 billion bits of information a second but we're only aware of 2000 of these but our awareness of those 2000 bits of information are just about the environment, our body and about time. A disproportionate amount of time was given in voice and film to Ramtha, Dr. Joe dispenza, and Miceal Ledwith. What The Bleep Do We Know DEBUNKED., page 2 Do We Know!? A moderately low-budget independent film, it was promoted using viral marketing methods and opened in art-house theaters in the western United States, winning several independent film awards before being picked up by a major distributor and eventually grossing over $10 million. What The Bleep Do We Know? . Debunked. - Renoise Forums Science Monitor has expired. While the movie "What The Bleep" has some flaws from a science point of view, science of this type is so foreign to most people, that they feel they have to "jazz it up" to keep people interested. A movie and a book said that water molecules are. Amanda is a divorced woman who makes a living as a photographer. A roommate of mine was interested in TM and I think it was he who introduced us. There are also phrases plagiarized entire from "The Matrix," a far superior film treatment of the notion that reality isn't what it seems. The Bleep in a Nutshell: 1. Pingback: yeago works Blog Archive Jesus, Buddha, Ken Wilber?? Staff meetings are tedious enough give me a conscious mind with a decent filter device any day. Quantum physics tells us that reality isn't fixed subatomic particles only come into existence when they are observed and 2. It presents itself as the thinking rebel's alternative to Hollywood pabulum: a heady stew of drama and documentary, starring Oscar-winning actress Marlee Matlin as a Xanax-addled photographer who. ", "What the Bleep Do We Know!? subscription. What the Bleep Do We Know? extended versions of What the BLEEP Do We Know! The point is, with quantum mechanics, everything doesn't go. We believe news can and should expand a sense of identity and possibility beyond narrow conventional expectations. Fred Alan Wolf, PhD in What the Bleep Do We Know? Quantum mechanics is crazy, but it's just crazy enough to make the world still be sensible at a macroscopic level, the level that we experience. When they use the word 'observe', they actually mean 'interact with', not look at or think about.). A disproportionate amount of time was given in voice and film to Ramtha, Dr. Joe dispenza, and Miceal Ledwith. He claims the drop was achieved. to someone you know: Wow, indeed! His list of "worst abusers" includes inspirational author Deepak Chopra, the best-selling book "The Secret" and the whole field of Transcendental Meditation. for only $16.05 $11/page. In the film, during a discussion of the influence of experience on perception, Candace Pert notes a story, which she says she believes is true, of Native Americans being unable to see Columbus's ships because they were outside their experience. A lot of the propaganda from them was hilarious, especially whenever candidates attempted to hold public speeches and performing demonstrations of yogic flying. Check my single page unpublishable http://dftuz.unizar.es/~rivero/research/simple.pdf. ( ) - What the bleep Do we know Q: Why do you think that people have seized upon this? You may or may not believe that there's an external reality beyond what your brain creates; the topic will be a perennial and fertile source of discussion. Daniel Monti, physician and director of the Mind-Body Medicine Program at. They were showing us the pictures of the waves converging to a point a meditation trick and this picture had a caption explaining that the unified field theory has already been found. He announced in 1994 (one year after the study) that violent crime had decreased 18%. A: Of course it does. He also invested over $10,000.00 in an infamous scam that infected RSE and was touted by Ramtha as a vehicle to gain fabulous wealth and many of the schools membership lost substantial sums of money. Whether or not you buy into its "you are God in the making" philosophy, "What the Bleep Do We Know?" You might think that meant there were 18% fewer violent crimes than in the previous year, but the decrease was actually relative to his predicted increase based on some fancy statistical footwork. On the other hand, one finds 3+1, or more concretely inverse square law, to be mathematically peculiar when it refers to gravity, ie when mass is the source of the force. During our current Covid19 pandemic, this collection is highly relevant to a world still seeking novel answers to the human condition and also drawn to old theories long ago debunked. Free delivery for many products. The pity of it is that there are fascinating conversations going on in the science-and-religion sphere. Now I don't have an automatic prejudice against 35,000-year-old warriors from Atlantis or the women who channel them. !" is a radical departure from convention. and of course the big guy himself, Ramtha. [3], Work was split between Toronto-based Mr. X Inc., Lost Boys Studios in Vancouver, and Atomic Visual Effects in Cape Town, South Africa. "[20], Journalist John Gorenfeld, writing in Salon, notes that the film's three directors are students of Ramtha's School of Enlightenment, which he says has been described as a cult. ), is hooked on prescription pills, and mopes about while her chirpy roommate spatters paint around their apartment. You are free to comment as you wish. In reality, science is completely incidental to the film's conclusions. Featuring interviews with scientists and theologians, this compelling film thrusts the viewer into a world where science and spirituality intersect. These photos may well be art they're sure as hell not science. All the weirdness of quantum mechanics gets washed out on the scale that we can experience. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser. [6], The Institute of Noetic Sciences, a New Age research organization that "explores phenomena that do not necessarily fit conventional scientific models", has supported What the Bleep Do We Know!? Mark was born in Johannesburg, South Africa . Then comes "Carl Sagan Meets Madame Blavatsky." What the Bleep Do We Know!? - WatchDocumentaries.com When a movie gets rave reviews as a mind-blowing flick about quantum physics, it's worth checking out. Interspersed with the plot were interviews with various supposed scientists with something to say about quantum physics, consciousness, God, etc. That's one of the very strange properties of quantum mechanics. What the Bleep Do We Know?: Discovering the Endless Possibilities for I don't know how many times I've heard people say, "Oh, I love quantum mechanics because I'm really into meditation, or I love the spiritual benefits that it brings me." [11], Scientists who have reviewed What the Bleep Do We Know!? Joe Dispenza, former Ramtha School of Enlightenment teacher, This page was last edited on 13 February 2023, at 23:23. "I create my own reality, says quantum physics," intones one expert, and the viewer could be lured to accept this as proof. Columbus certainly didn't speak the language, and the locals didn't keep written records. (Source: iStockphoto). continue to use the site without a "I think the point is that Feynman realized that people can be fooled, but nature can't.". So far, so good. At some point I guess he updated it to string field theory and the version you provided a link for. Author, speaker, and award-winning Writer/Director/Producer Mark Vicente was part of the creative team behind the sleeper hit "What The Bleep Do We Know?!". Professor Clive Greated wrote that "thinking on neurology and addiction are covered in some detail but, unfortunately, early references in the film to quantum physics are not followed through, leading to a confused message". During the Fall of the year Amanda begins to see the world in new and different ways when she begins to question her role in life, her relationships with her career and men and what it all means. So you forgive the film's jelly-baby graphics, daggy storyline, and that Gabor sister channelling a warrior spirit from Atlantis. What the Bleep Do We Know!? | Bleep 2 - The Prodigal Movie There was some sort of plot involving a woman photographer (played by Marlee Matlin), who wanders around and has anxiety attacks. so much for no good or bad, that is unless it is convienent. Dr Joe Dispenza (the one who creates his day) has gone to court and testified that his teacher (ramtha) has told him that terrible times are coming and that he needs to protect his family. John Haglin Water beamed messages of love or gratitude formed itself into lovely snowflake-like crystals; water exposed to the words "You make me sick" looks like the surface of a toxic waste pond. A scientist debunks the claim that water reacts to human emotions. In the last of a series of columns written for Scientific American, Krauss says "no area of physics stimulates more nonsense in the public arena than quantum mechanics." In addition to the films three directors, there were actors and others involved in the production who are long time students of Ramthas School of enlightenment. Dr Emoto takes photos of crystals formed in freezing water. 1. Filmed to promote a new age philosophy based on a very, very broad interpretation of quantum physics, the movie was funded by J. Many people are dubious that Penrose's suggestions are reasonable, because the brain is not an isolated quantum-mechanical system. But that doesn't mean that astrology is true. Easton's 1897 Bible Dictionary. Unfortunately, it also completely misunderstands it. What The BLEEP Do We Know!? - The A.V. Club Cathleen Falsani, who must have been taking notes while I was staring gobsmacked at the screen, quotes the 35,year-old . (Physicists should take part of the blame for this confusion. What the 'Bleep'!?:Down The Rabbit Hole - DVD Talk This movie agrees with the scientists as far as the existence of the so called empty space is concerned. If you wanted to study the impact of spoken, drawn or written sentiments on the formation of crystals in freezing water, you'd have to do a slightly more rigorous study. What the Bleep!?: Down the Rabbit Hole (2006) - IMDb Answer: Photographer. In the documentary segments of the film, interviewees discuss the roots and meaning of Amanda's experiences. What The Bleep Do We Know If you want to affect something in the external world, you have to do something to it.